The recovery that began to emerge late in the third quarter of 2014 couldn’t help Thailand’s hotel industry overcome a dismal first half of the year as the industry reported a year-on-year occupancy decline of 11.3%.
The country’s occupancy drop was primarily driven by Bangkok’s hotels, which had a year-on-year 16.2% decline. During more than six months of the year, occupancy in the city was down more than 20% year-on-year.
Phuket’s occupancy dropped 5.7% year-on-year, which led to levels just slightly above those of 2011 – this mainly driven by low-season (May through June) decline beyond normality – and less peak season effects.
Koh Samui held up reasonably well, with a slight decrease in occupancy of 1.6% over 2013, and the only negative effect year over year was during low season.
The recovery that began late in the third quarter blossomed in Q4 as numbers dramatically turned around for Bangkok. After the dismal start to the year, RevPAR increased by 2.5% year-on-year in the last quarter. Occupancy in December for Bangkok was one of the highest recorded by STR Global since 2000. It was the best Q4 for Bangkok occupancy since 2006.
“The story is similar for Thailand as a whole. RevPAR was the second best Q4 for the last decade. It would thus suggest that six to nine months is the new recovery time norm for Bangkok,” said Jesper Palmqvist, STR Global’s area director-Asia Pacific.
In local currency terms, ADR for Thailand as a whole in 2014 was up 2.6% year-on-year, with Bangkok once again proving that it is able to sustain rates throughout market turmoil. While there were hotels that lost significant rates, the fact that ADR ended flat year-on-year speaks volumes to the amount of hotels firmly holding their ground.
“It was slightly different for resort markets. Though Koh Samui’s rates for peak season aren’t at historic record levels, the market’s hotels have continuously lifted rates during lower demand seasons, with less of the drastic negative rate movements seen in the past,” Palmqvist said. “This is particularly interesting since Koh Samui has more seasonal variety than a destination such as Phuket.”
Phuket has consistently raised peak season rates (December through January) since the reboot in 2010 and after the low season floor was raised back in 2012; it has been sustained each year.
“One impressive market to mention was Chiang Mai, though occupancy decreased 4.2% on a year-on-year basis. The market’s hotels had positive RevPAR growth driven by continued positive ADR movement. This is particularly qualitative when considering that Chiang Mai has grown rate by solid numbers for the past few years,” according to Palmqvist.
Hua Hin was also able to hold rates reasonably well, but Pattaya suffered more due to a 10% decline in occupancy year-on-year.
Supply growth has continued to slow and seems to have aided performance during the economic downturn in 2014, specifically during the second half of the year. STR Global says it hasn’t seen such low supply growth in Thailand as a whole for 10 years, and Bangkok was the main contributing market to that trend.